Timothy Brown & Will Weeks
September 12, 2012
Assignment # 2
Don’t be so Cerebral
“A
potentially paradigm-shifting work, for the communicating of science, calling
for a new appreciation and focus not just on maintaining scientific accuracy,
but also on the equally important need to hold the interest of the public.”(1)
This praising review by Chris Mooney is in reference to the Book Don’t be such a Scientist: Talking Substance
in an Age of Style written by Randy Olson. Although the title may suggest a
negative outlook towards scientists, Randy Olsen is actually calling for scientists to stray
away from a cerebral mindset by hitting many key points in his book on ways to
help scientists communicate. In addition, this book has the potential to be a summer
reader due to the fact that Olson is very supportive of his scientific engaging
theme.
Indifferences
between science and the public are the main foundation of this science
communication text. Throughout most of the book Olson refers to how scientists
only communicate with facts straight from the brain thus resulting in an
uninterested public. Olson further explains that scientists often forget who
their audience is, and therefore use scientific language that is unfamiliar. He
then goes on to suggest that scientists need to communicate in the ways a movie
actor would, by implementing other ‘voice organs’ such as the heart, gut, and
sex organs. Randy Olson, once an esteemed marine biologist, pursued a degree in
filmmaking. During his film -making career, Olsen realized that filmmakers were
focused on portraying their message to viewers, where as scientists were not as
concerned with confirming that their message had gotten across. He also
discovered that filmmakers capture their audience’s attention with heartfelt
emotion, gut- turning humor, and awkward sex analogies, and in turn he used
these strategies on his own films about science. Although a science related
film may lose accuracy when using Olsen’s method, Olson was still able to
inspire others to appreciate science in new ways. As Olson allows us into the
shoes of a movie director producing a science related film, we are given
numerous tips on how to create a bestselling blockbuster. These tips include,
being less cerebral, less literal minded, better story tellers, and more
likeable all while striving to be the voice of science.
Within
that first summer before starting college, life is full of excitement up until
your professor assigns that summer reader. Despite dreading that first
assignment this book, Don’t be Such a
Scientist, would have actually been a somewhat pleasurable summer reader.
This text, while discussing an assumed boring topic, actually became
interesting as we were drowned in great stories proving that science needs to
be communicated. Our attention is quickly grabbed through the directing
role-play and fulfilled with the desire to communicate science in a more
audience friendly way, given we pursue that career path. This book offers a
great insight to the cultural indifference of science versus public while
keeping the attention of its reader throughout. For these reasons, professors
looking for a science communication related text should definitely consider
this book because although it doesn’t explain the reasons for indifference, it
offers solutions, which makes for a better introduction to any course.
In
comparison to Unscientific America: How
Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future, co-authored by Chris Mooney and
Sheril Kirshenbaum. When comparing the two texts, Randy Olson does a better job
at providing solutions for the disconnect between science and the public, while
Chris and Sheril only seem to focus on the reasons for the disconnect. Although
history and causes are important, solutions are even better. Although both
texts are important, Don’t be Such a
Scientist is much more engaging and fulfilling by offering solutions and
giving the readers a futuristic outlook rather than sticking in the present or
past. We certainly feel that Randy Olson’s book is far more exciting and
informative that of Unscientific America
for that reason.
Science
may not always be interesting, understandable, or agreed upon, yet even during
those moments Randy Olson has established a modern way to help counteract this
dislike. Through his movies featuring science topics he has offered a great
tactic against cultural indifferences as he breaks the barriers of
communication. Throughout his book, he is intensely supportive of breaking this
barrier and restoring science into the publics mind. We certainly feel led to
help support his cause after reading this book for science is matter in which
cannot be ignored.
Bibliography
1. Olson,
Randy. Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style.
Washington,
DC: Island, 2009. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment